Ideal Weight Versus Goal Weight

I was just thinking this morning about the intersection (or not) between ideal weight and goal weight.  And, to be honest, now that I am at a normal BMI, I am struggling with losing weight to get to a more ideal weight where my body fat percentage would be lower. I do think that having a goal weight — whether on Weight Watchers or simply losing to a personal goal — has a benefit.  It gives me something to shoot for.  While I was trying to get to my official goal weight of 126 pounds, I constantly set smaller goals along the way.  In Fitbit, I would set a 5 or 10 pound goal, then meet it and go on.  But, then I got to my goal weight of 146 pounds.

For a number of years now, Weight Watchers has set the official healthy weight range based upon BMI.  146 pounds at 5’4″ is at the top of the BMI “normal” weight range. As a lifetime member, meeting that number means I can attend meetings for free and get free eTools.  There is a tiny bit of wiggle room.  That is, if I am not more than 2 pounds above goal weight, I maintain my free status.

I remember last summer when I got to 146 pounds, I felt this huge feeling of relief.  I was normal weight.  I had left obese the year before, and it feel truly strange to be leaving the category of overweight.  I had been overweight for about 25 years.  Wrapping my head around the idea of being normal took time.  And, even though I know I still have too much body fat, I know that I have accomplished a lot to get where I am.  And, my body fat now is better than it was before.  Getting to a normal BMI was an achievement for me.

At the same time, I realize that the concept of picking a goal weight based upon BMI is, at best, flawed.  By this time, I am sure most of us have heard about BMI’s disadvantages.  And, at best, there are limitations to using BMI in part because it doesn’t measure body fat directly.  The weight lifter or athlete with high amounts of muscle, but low body fat may measure as overweight on BMI without having actual excess fat. Now, that is not the same thing as saying BMI is meaningless.  The reality is that most of us who are overweight by BMI are also over fat.  We aren’t athletes with a lot of muscle and low body fat.  And, if you are, then you know that.  When I was obese and overweight it was because I had too much body fat.

And, then, suddenly (well, after 25 years) I was at a normal BMI and I was at my Weight Watchers goal.  And, all was kittens and puppies and rainbows.  And, yet, having gotten to that goal weight it feels at times like it is its own kind of tyranny.  And, it seems to get in the way of me mentally working on getting to my ideal weight. There are really a couple of issues. [Read more…]

Glass Half Full…or Half Empty?

Sometimes, it can be difficult to decide if that glass is half full or half empty.  I sort of feel like that right now.  On the one hand, I did this to my iPhone screen:

iphone cracked screen

On the other hand, it cost $129 (plus tax) to repair when it cost over $200 a couple of years ago when I had a cracked screen on my prior phone.  And, this was spectacular enough damage that the employees in the Apple store asked me how I did it.  Had I dropped something heavy on it?  No. I dropped it putting it into a pocket.  It fell straight down and didn’t even land on the glass.  Go figure.

So what does that have to do with glasses and how full they are?  And, what does that have to do with weight loss and maintenance?  On the one hand, I reached my Weight Watchers goal weight on July 31.  Since then I haven’t had to pay for a meeting.  I am currently not more than 2 pounds over my goal weight, so I don’t have to pay for meetings and I get free eTools.  At the November weigh in, I weighed 147 pounds. [Read more…]

Body Fat Plan

It is funny how sitting in a strange looking contraption can concentrate the mind and help to give direction.

Bod Pod

And so it was after I had my body fat tested in the Bod Pod and had my resting metabolic rate tested.

To recap, I found that despite having reached a normal BMI, my body fat was 45.3% and my resting metabolic rate was a low 1120 calories a day (over 100 calories a day less than Fitbit estimated).

What was apparent from this is that I have an extreme case of Skinny Fat.  There was a recent graph in the New York Times that plotted body fat percentage against Body Mass Index (BMI).  If you haven’t seen it go, take a lot at it.  You can see that 15% of women have a normal or underweight BMI, but have more than 35% body fat.  I already knew I was in that group.  But look carefully, at the line that shows 45% body fat.  And, then look at the line for 25 BMI.  You can see that having that high a body fat percentage with BMI that low is really, really super rare.  And…that is me.

So, I need to do something about that.  I had posted awhile ago, that once I got to a normal BMI I wanted to work on body composition.  At that time, I wanted to get to under 35% body fat with an advanced goal of under 30%.  Of course, at the time I thought I was probably at no more than 40% body fat, even allowing for my scale body fat percentage to be wrong.  But, it seems things are much worse than I thought.

I currently have about 81 pounds of Lean Body Mass (basically everything that isn’t fat).  While I know my scale doesn’t give an accurate body fat percentage in terms of an absolute number, I do think that the direction it shows me going over a period of time is probably accurate.  If so, then I did reduce my body fat percentage while I was losing weight.  I would guess I probably started at well over 50%.  Based upon the measurements I did guess, I think that while losing weight about 70% of what I lost was fat (good) and about 30% of what I lost was muscle (not good).

The key thing now is that I can’t afford to lose any more muscle.  If I simply keep the muscle that I have, I would need to lose all the way down to 124 pounds to get to just under 35% body fat!  That would be if I lost only fat.  To get to below 30% body fat, I would need to get to 115 pounds.  None of that really enthuses me.  For one thing, my calorie burn would be so low at those weights that I would find it very hard to sustain them.  Furthermore, to be at those weights without building muscle I would look really skinny and have no muscle definition.

I could try to build muscle now.  Theoretically I could eat at a calorie surplus and really work on the strength training and try to gain muscle.  That would also improve my body fat percentage.  Still, I know I have excess fat and I need to lose fat.  If I try to gain muscle, there is no way I will gain only muscle.  I put on fat easily (obviously) and some part of that would be fat. So I would go above a normal BMI and would still be over fat.

Of course, what I really want to do is add muscle while losing fat.  That is, however, very difficult to do.  It is, however, easier to do for weight lifting beginners.  So, I might be able to gain some muscle while mostly losing fat over the next few months.

Saturday I had a training session with my personal trainer and I told him that I really want to work hard to gain muscle.  We had been doing a circuit training session where I would do one set of each exercise then repeat the circuit twice.  This had the virtue of not needing much down time so I could do 3 sets of 12 reps on quite a few exercises.  And, I kept my heart rate up during the entire time which increased my calorie burn.  On the other hand, that isn’t quite as effective for building muscle.  So, we are going to switch to doing 3 sets of reps all in a row.  To do this I will have to rest between sets, so we are upping the weights and lowering the number of reps.  I am hoping that by doing this I will — at a minimum — preserve muscle mass and won’t lose any more.  And, maybe there is a possibility for some muscle growth.

Also, I am going to increase my protein intake.  I’ve been averaging about 70 grams a day.  I’ve often seen a recommendation of 1 gram per pound of body weight.  But, reading some stuff written by Tom Venuto (I can’t link to it as it a members only site), he suggested that if you have excess fat you might want to base protein goals on your lean body mass instead.  That is, I may not need to eat extra protein to sustain my body fat.  So, I’ve decided to aim for a minimum of 100 grams of protein a day.

I am also thinking about how many calories to eat.  I’ve analyzed my RMR test results (1120 calories a day) and applied a discount factor to my old Fitbit calorie burn numbers (adjusting them down since Fitbit had my RMR over 100 calories a day too high).  From that, I’ve estimated that during a week where I exercise 5 or 6 days I average about 1500 calories burned a day.  So, this sort of explains why it was so hard for me to lose weight at 1200 calories a day.  That was only a deficit of 300 calories a day!

I know that to lose body fat I have to have a calorie deficit.  But, I don’t want to have such a calorie deficit each day that I end up losing muscle.  I’m thinking about possibly eating at a maintenance level a couple of days a week.  Maybe even a tiny surplus. I’m going to experiment for awhile and see.

So, I feel sort of energized by having a clear goal now.  Don’t lose any muscle.  Lose fat.  Add muscle.  Improve my body fat percentage.  Doing this will probably result in weight loss, but that actually doesn’t matter.  I want to get to 35% body fat (as a first goal).  Right now, that looks like 124 pounds.  But, if I can gain some muscle then I can earn the right to weigh more than that.  So, we’ll see.

At this point, I think I will go back in about 2 to 3 months and do the Bod Pod again.  I will want to see if I have made made any progress.

Skinny Fat!

I think I can officially now say that I’m definitely skinny fat.  And, Shannon, at least part of it was definitely worse than I expected!

Friday was the day that I was having Resting Metabolic Testing (RMR) and Body Fat testing using the Bod Pod.

Resting Metabolic Rate Testing

RMR tells you what calories you burn just existing, without doing anything.  The linked article says that there are two ways to calculate RMR.  One way is to use various formulas based upon things like height and weight while some include body fat.  The other way is to use indirect calorimetry which uses your expired gases to calculate the fuel being used and then to convert that information to calculate the number of calories burned.  That was the type of test I had.

I had a long list of instructions.  I couldn’t eat or drink anything other than water for at least 4 hours before the test.  I couldn’t exercise at least 4 hours before the test.  There was a restriction on taking anything with pseudoephedrine or caffeine for at least 4 hours before the test.  I also found a web site which said it was best to not exercise for 12 to 24 hours before the test, so I skipped my Thursday exercise.

When I went in to have the test, I was given something to clip on my nose so I could only breathe through my mouth, then I had to breathe naturally into the device:

RMR Test

This was sort of a weird feeling.  I was given napkins, because the person administering the test told me that toward the end I would actually drool (yuck!).  I sat there quietly just breathing and it actually was over more quickly than I expected.  The result was:  1120 calories RMR.

To put in perspective, the Mifflin-St Jeor formula used by Fitbit gives me an RMR of 1224.  So, not even counting any other activity during the day, Fitbit is already overestimating the calories I burn by at least 104 calories a day.  The guy administering the test did stress to me that lots of things can affect RMR, so what Fitbit gives is not exact and is an estimate.  For example, the things I couldn’t do for 4 hours before the test (eat, exercise, take caffeine and so on) are all things that can increase metabolic rate.

I’ve often posted here that my actual weight loss has generally been less than what I might expect from my Fitbit calorie deficit.  Some of that, I’m sure, is because the food calories eaten are not exact — I doubt restaurants carefully measure ingredients to match calorie counts on a website and while I weigh my food most of the time, I know I’m not perfect either.

Still, I had the feeling that my RMR was just not the 1224 Fitbit predicts.  And, it isn’t.  What that means is that my RMR is about 91.5% of what Fitbit says.  So, what I want to do is lower the calorie burn Fitbit gives me by 8.5% to get something that might be more accurate.  I know it won’t be exact, but I am hoping that would be more accurate. The other day Fitbit said I burned 1692 calories and I had a deficit of 284 calories for the day.  If I adjust that down by 8.5%, I get a burn of 1548 calories which reduces my calorie deficit to 108 calories. And, the difference adds up.  Last month Fitbit said I burned an average of 1449 calories a day (yes, I know that was low).  But, reducing it 8.5%, I get an average calorie burn of 1326 calories.  So, my deficit of 166 calories a day suddenly becomes 43 calories a day.

The problem is that Fitbit, though, won’t let you set a custom RMR.  You have to use their formula.  But, there is a work around to trick Fitbit into changing your RMR which I got from the linked article.  Basically I changed my age and height on Fitbit until the formula gave me an RMR of 1121 (the closest I could manage to 1120).  Basically Fitbit now thinks I am several years older and 4 inches shorter, but my RMR is now correct and I should get a more accurate, albeit it more depressing, calorie burn number.

It is sort of sad to realize that on a day when I thought I was burning about 1700 calories, I was really only burning 1550 calories.  But, that is the reality and I need to know that so that I have a better idea of what I need to do to either lose weight or maintain weight loss.

Oh – I paid $75 for the RMR testing which seems fair given the time it took to do it.

Body Fat Testing – Bod Pod

Once the RMR testing was over, I headed over to have my body fat tested using the Bod Pod.  That is kind of a cutesy name, but it is actually pretty accurate.  Herewith the Bod Pod:

Bod Pod

This is actually a pretty simple test.  You just sit in the Bod Pod for about 45 seconds and that’s it.  First, though, I had to change clothes.  The instructions are to either wear a swimsuit or a sports bra and tight shorts.  I ended up wearing a sports bra and swimsuit bottoms.  I didn’t wear the entire swimsuit as a website I read said to wear a tight Spandex suit or a sports bra and compression shorts. I didn’t have a tight suit. The link isn’t to where I went but it had more detailed instructions that I got.  I didn’t think about it at the time, but I hope what I wore was tight enough.  The sports bra was fine, but the swimsuit bottoms were kind of lose.  I bought them as part of a swimsuit with a loose top (which is why I didn’t use it) and regular two piece bottoms.  However, I bought them 50 pounds or so ago so they were kind of loose.  I wish I had thought to ask, but if they weren’t OK I guess the person testing me would have said something.

Anyway, I also had to wear a swim cap and then I just sat in the Bod Pod.  It was a little cold inside, but not too bad.  He ran it for about 45 seconds, opened the door, then ran it a second time and we were done. The Bod Pod testing cost $50.  There are some mobile Bod Pods that I think are a little cheaper, but this was easier than trying to chase down one of them.

OK, I’ve put it off long enough.  I measured on my home scale before leaving and it said my body fat percentage was 38%.  That is fairly typical over the last month or so.  The highest was 39.25%.  Of course, I knew that body fat scales are notoriously inaccurate.  I didn’t expect mine to be off in my favor and was sort of expecting a result around 40%.  Well, that turned out to be wildly optimistic.

The result was…. 45.3% body fat.  That was fairly depressing.  On the analysis I received, anything over 40% was considered risky and from 30.1% to 40% was excess fat.  For me, my first goal has been to get to 35%, as some consider that to be the critical number of older women.  Getting to 30% seems a long way away.

The really difficult part is realizing that if I kept my lean body mass exactly the same — didn’t lose or gain — I would need to lose fat all the way down to about 124 pounds to get to 35% body fat.  That is not a pretty thought.  I have done it before, but it was really difficult and I didn’t sustain it.

I was actually going to talk in this post about what I plan to do and how this affects my goals.  But, that is going to be long enough I’ll save it until later.

Oh, one thing was interesting.  The Bod Pod analysis gave me an estimated RMR of 1069 calories which was based upon the information from the Bod Pod.  The good news is that the tester said that my RMR result of 1120 was more accurate as it was actually measured while the Bod Pod was an estimate.  So, from that standpoint, at least something went good. I’m glad I sprang for the RMR testing.  One place I called just offered the RMR from the Bod Pod and I can see that kind of estimate is not as accurate as actually doing the breathing test.

While I’m not happy about the body fat number, I realize that it is what it is and not knowing doesn’t change that.  I might like thinking it was 38%, but that isn’t accurate and it is better to know real numbers than fake numbers.  I still think the body fat percentage my scale gives me is of some value as I’ve seen it come down a lot while losing weight.  So, I think the relative improvement has been shown to me, but this probably means I started out with a much higher body percentage than I realized.

More later about where I go from here.

 

Day Of Reckoning is Nigh

Well, a day of reckoning for me is near…Friday actually.  One of the things I’ve long wanted to do is have my body fat percentage checked using a Bod Pod.  When I first heard about it, it was kind of expensive so I decided I would do it when I got to my goal weight.

I know that my body fat is too high and my main goal now is to get to a body fat below 35% and, ideally, less than 30%.  I have  Withings scale which does measure body fat.  I think it is better than nothing, but it is very inconsistent.  Some of that is because the amount of water in our bodies changes and the other part is that these scales are just not that accurate at measuring body fat.  And, I’ve read they tend be more inaccurate for those with a lot of body fat and for those who are older.  So, I’m thinking that my scale probably under estimates my body fat.  Sigh.

So, I’ve arranged to have a Bod Pod measure of my body fat this Friday.  It will cost me $50.  In addition, I am paying another $75 to get my resting metabolic rate measure. As I’ve posted before, there are various equations that estimate resting metabolic rate.  Some use age and weight, while others take body fat into consideration.  Those, however, are just estimations.  I often feel the Fitbit estimate of my calorie burn is off a little.  It uses an equation that doesn’t take into body fat (since most people don’t know their body fat percentage this makes sense).  But, even so, the formulas that use body fat are still an estimation.

Another way is to actually measure your metabolic rate by having you breathe while wearing a mask.  Apparently the gases in the air you breathe out are analyzed and your metabolic rate is determined.  I am really interested in this test as I can compare it to what Fitbit uses and will be able to know how much that is off and make adjustments.  This is important to me in trying to maintain weight loss so I don’t overestimate how much I can eat.

Of course, the resting metabolic rate doesn’t tell me how much I actually burn each day since I do move around during the day and burn more than that.  Still, if Fitbit, for example, things I’m burning significantly more calories at rest than I am burning then I want to know that.

For this test, I can’t exercise or eat for at least 4 hours beforehand, since those things can affect my metabolic rate.  I’ve scheduled to do the testing at 11:00 and just won’t eat breakfast until afterwards.

I have a feeling I’m going to feel kind of sad after the testing.  Over the last month, my scale says my average body fat percentage was 38.4%.  The lowest was 36.65% and the highest was 39.25%.  I have this real feeling that the actual number is going to be over 40% which won’t make me very happy.  But, it is what it is and not knowing doesn’t change that fact.  I also suspect my resting metabolic rate is lower than the estimates say it is.  Again, though, the reality is what it is and not knowing won’t help me.

I’ll post back about the results after I do them.  My plan is to go back and do the Bod Pod again in a few months if I feel my body fat has gone down significantly.